# Derivation — eu-2026-1744/art_001/pt_031/d

> COMPOSED TEXT - NOT AUTHENTIC. This is the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) with the Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, in force 27 July 2026) applied by a deterministic, gated parser. Only the Official Journal publications are authentic law; no official consolidated version existed when this was generated. Corrigenda R(01)-R(04) do not correct the English text (verified against CELLAR). Every fragment's derivation chain is available in the source graphs (vault: data/graph/). Not legal advice.

- Page: https://eu-ai-act.standards.riskmandate.ai/derivations/art_001__pt_031__d.html
- Structured: https://eu-ai-act.standards.riskmandate.ai/derivations/art_001__pt_031__d.llm.json
- Text version: 2026-07-27 (generated 2026-07-31)
- Site version: v0.1.4
- Provisions root hash: `77c4ca7c208d73adc24b9a41eb29724bee29a41df98b786b85c57852fa3ae6bd`
- Instruction id: `eu-2026-1744/art_001/pt_031/d`
- Operation: insert_after · level: paragraph
- In force: 2026-07-27
- Payload sha256: `4eb1dbbc131dc313ba32323c174e02621074f971e8aef001adef0e7d8f5c4c7a`
- OJ Formex member: `L_202601744EN.000101.fmx.xml` (CELEX 32026R1744)

## Context (enacting terms)

> Article 75 is amended as follows:

## Instruction (quoted official text)

> the following paragraph is inserted:

## Quoted payload (official replacement/inserted text)

2a.Where a market surveillance authority has well-founded and sufficient reasons to suspect that a provider or a deployer of an AI system referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article has infringed this Regulation, it may request, through the relevant single point of contact designated in accordance with Article 70(2), the AI Office to assess the matter in order to take the necessary supervisory and enforcement measures to ensure prompt compliance with this Regulation. Such a request shall be duly reasoned and shall include at least:(a)the name of the provider or the deployer concerned;(b)a description of the relevant facts, the provisions of this Regulation that have allegedly been infringed, and any well-founded and sufficient reasons for suspecting an infringement, including, where applicable, the description of the negative effects of the alleged infringement;(c)the market surveillance authority making the request.The AI Office shall take utmost account of the request and the market surveillance authority shall cooperate actively and provide the AI Office the necessary assistance for the exercise of its powers in accordance with paragraph 1a.The AI Office shall, without undue delay and in any event no later than four months following receipt of the request, inform the single point of contact of its intention to exercise its powers in accordance with Article 75a or of its reasons for not exercising its powers. If the AI Office decides to exercise its powers in accordance with Article 75a, it shall periodically inform that single point of contact about major developments in the proceedings and the outcome of such proceedings, without disclosing any confidential information.;

## Affected provisions

### `eu-2024-1689/art_075/par_002a` — inserted

**Before:** _(no previous text — inserted provision)_

**After (composed current text):**

2a. Where a market surveillance authority has well-founded and sufficient reasons to suspect that a provider or a deployer of an AI system referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article has infringed this Regulation, it may request, through the relevant single point of contact designated in accordance with Article 70(2), the AI Office to assess the matter in order to take the necessary supervisory and enforcement measures to ensure prompt compliance with this Regulation. Such a request shall be duly reasoned and shall include at least: The AI Office shall take utmost account of the request and the market surveillance authority shall cooperate actively and provide the AI Office the necessary assistance for the exercise of its powers in accordance with paragraph 1a. The AI Office shall, without undue delay and in any event no later than four months following receipt of the request, inform the single point of contact of its intention to exercise its powers in accordance with Article 75a or of its reasons for not exercising its powers. If the AI Office decides to exercise its powers in accordance with Article 75a, it shall periodically inform that single point of contact about major developments in the proceedings and the outcome of such proceedings, without disclosing any confidential information.
(a) the name of the provider or the deployer concerned;
(b) a description of the relevant facts, the provisions of this Regulation that have allegedly been infringed, and any well-founded and sufficient reasons for suspecting an infringement, including, where applicable, the description of the negative effects of the alleged infringement;
(c) the market surveillance authority making the request.

- sha256 of composed text: `56cdfe476fc1a91c03be748684450e37fc0a61ade8d1d514218632f6e52e5d70`

## How to check this

Compare the quoted instruction and payload above (hash-anchored to the OJ Formex bytes of CELEX 32026R1744) against the before/after text. That is the whole verification for this provision — about two minutes. Report the result, including the root hash above: https://github.com/Risk-Mandate/Risk-Mandate__EU-AI-Act__Current-Text/issues/new?template=provision-check.yml