RMRisk Mandate · the business risk layer for autonomous systemsriskmandate.ai ↗
EU EU AI Act — Current Textv0.1.3
Composed current text — not authentic. COMPOSED TEXT - NOT AUTHENTIC. This is the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) with the Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, in force 27 July 2026) applied by a deterministic, gated parser. Only the Official Journal publications are authentic law; no official consolidated version existed when this was generated. Corrigenda R(01)-R(04) do not correct the English text (verified against CELLAR). Every fragment's derivation chain is available in the source graphs (vault: data/graph/). Not legal advice.
Derivation

eu-2026-1744/art_001/pt_012/a

op replace · level paragraph · enacting-terms position (12) (a) · in force 2026-07-27

Context (enacting terms)

Article 25 is amended as follows:

The instruction (quoted official text)

paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:

Quoted payload (official replacement/inserted text)

2.Where the circumstances referred to in paragraph 1 occur, the provider that initially placed the AI system on the market or put it into service shall no longer be considered to be a provider of that specific AI system for the purposes of this Regulation.That initial provider shall closely cooperate with new providers and shall make available the necessary information and provide the reasonably expected technical access and other assistance that are required for the fulfilment of the obligations set out in this Regulation, in particular with regard to compliance with the conformity assessment of high-risk AI systems.In particular, the obligation laid down in the second subparagraph shall include, where relevant for the purposes specified therein, the following:(a)making available of technical documentation sufficient to assess compliance with the requirements laid down in Article 16;(b)informing the new providers about known limitations and failure modes; and(c)providing the new providers with targeted technical access, including for testing and validation.This paragraph shall not apply in cases where the initial provider has clearly specified that its AI system is not to be changed into a high-risk AI system and therefore does not fall under the obligation to cooperate with the new providers and hand over the documentation.;

Provenance

linkvalue
payload xml sha256aa3ff921e2f0b49c0ef21b3e98d828f7652b004af79e887f266468de5fd29ea2
OJ Formex memberL_202601744EN.000101.fmx.xml
CELLAR / CELEX32026R1744
target resolutiongrammar over enacting terms; cross-checked against payload Formex IDENTIFIER attributes where present (parser-derived)

Affected provisions

eu-2024-1689/art_025/par_002 amended

BEFORE (as published)

2. Where the circumstances referred to in paragraph 1 occur, the provider that initially placed the AI system on the market or put it into service shall no longer be considered to be a provider of that specific AI system for the purposes of this Regulation. That initial provider shall closely cooperate with new providers and shall make available the necessary information and provide the reasonably expected technical access and other assistance that are required for the fulfilment of the obligations set out in this Regulation, in particular regarding the compliance with the conformity assessment of high-risk AI systems. This paragraph shall not apply in cases where the initial provider has clearly specified that its AI system is not to be changed into a high-risk AI system and therefore does not fall under the obligation to hand over the documentation.

AFTER (composed current text)

2. Where the circumstances referred to in paragraph 1 occur, the provider that initially placed the AI system on the market or put it into service shall no longer be considered to be a provider of that specific AI system for the purposes of this Regulation. That initial provider shall closely cooperate with new providers and shall make available the necessary information and provide the reasonably expected technical access and other assistance that are required for the fulfilment of the obligations set out in this Regulation, in particular with regard to compliance with the conformity assessment of high-risk AI systems. In particular, the obligation laid down in the second subparagraph shall include, where relevant for the purposes specified therein, the following: This paragraph shall not apply in cases where the initial provider has clearly specified that its AI system is not to be changed into a high-risk AI system and therefore does not fall under the obligation to cooperate with the new providers and hand over the documentation. (a) making available of technical documentation sufficient to assess compliance with the requirements laid down in Article 16; (b) informing the new providers about known limitations and failure modes; and (c) providing the new providers with targeted technical access, including for testing and validation.

WORD-LEVEL DIFF

2. Where the circumstances referred to in paragraph 1 occur, the provider that initially placed the AI system on the market or put it into service shall no longer be considered to be a provider of that specific AI system for the purposes of this Regulation. That initial provider shall closely cooperate with new providers and shall make available the necessary information and provide the reasonably expected technical access and other assistance that are required for the fulfilment of the obligations set out in this Regulation, in particular regardingwith theregard to compliance with the conformity assessment of high-risk AI systems. In particular, the obligation laid down in the second subparagraph shall include, where relevant for the purposes specified therein, the following: This paragraph shall not apply in cases where the initial provider has clearly specified that its AI system is not to be changed into a high-risk AI system and therefore does not fall under the obligation to cooperate with the new providers and hand over the documentation. (a) making available of technical documentation sufficient to assess compliance with the requirements laid down in Article 16; (b) informing the new providers about known limitations and failure modes; and (c) providing the new providers with targeted technical access, including for testing and validation.

Check this and report · derivation.json

How to check: compare the quoted instruction and payload above (hash-anchored to the OJ Formex bytes) against the BEFORE/AFTER panes. Two minutes, one provision. Then file the result — "checks out" is worth recording too.