RMRisk Mandate · the business risk layer for autonomous systemsriskmandate.ai ↗
EU EU AI Act — Current Textv0.1.3
Composed current text — not authentic. COMPOSED TEXT - NOT AUTHENTIC. This is the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) with the Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, in force 27 July 2026) applied by a deterministic, gated parser. Only the Official Journal publications are authentic law; no official consolidated version existed when this was generated. Corrigenda R(01)-R(04) do not correct the English text (verified against CELLAR). Every fragment's derivation chain is available in the source graphs (vault: data/graph/). Not legal advice.
Derivation

eu-2026-1744/art_001/pt_038/c

op insert_after · level paragraph · enacting-terms position (38) (c) · in force 2026-07-27

Context (enacting terms)

Article 99 is amended as follows:

The instruction (quoted official text)

the following paragraph is inserted:

Quoted payload (official replacement/inserted text)

6a.In the case of SMCs, each fine referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5 shall be up to the percentages or amount referred therein, whichever is lower.;

Provenance

linkvalue
payload xml sha25681f05ec6c8c1b1e95539cf07c74790714c75fd48e55cc26ede6e23e9fe1aa791
OJ Formex memberL_202601744EN.000101.fmx.xml
CELLAR / CELEX32026R1744
target resolutiongrammar over enacting terms; cross-checked against payload Formex IDENTIFIER attributes where present (parser-derived)

Affected provisions

eu-2024-1689/art_099/par_006a inserted

BEFORE

(no previous text — inserted provision)

AFTER (composed current text)

6a. In the case of SMCs, each fine referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5 shall be up to the percentages or amount referred therein, whichever is lower.

Check this and report · derivation.json

How to check: compare the quoted instruction and payload above (hash-anchored to the OJ Formex bytes) against the BEFORE/AFTER panes. Two minutes, one provision. Then file the result — "checks out" is worth recording too.